For many in Bengal, food is inseparable from identity, with maach and maangsho, or fish and mutton, representing an emotion rather than mere sustenance. S Syed Qamar Ahmed, a native of Bihar and frequent visitor to Kolkata, framed the issue at a biryani outlet as one of personal freedom, arguing that food choices must depend on individuals rather than government mandates. While acknowledging the political debates, Ahmed suggested the larger concern for voters remains peace and coexistence, urging that governments should focus on maintaining harmony so that citizens of all religions feel secure. He noted that while the BJP discusses good governance, workers sometimes provoke feelings, and he emphasized that whichever government emerges should prioritize safety without disturbing communal harmony.
Inside another bustling outlet, an anonymous staff member reflected a cautious mood, suggesting that Mamata Banerjee’s remarks are linked to developments in other parts of India where tensions over dietary habits have surfaced. He described a lingering concern that politics centered on food could deepen social divides, noting that since roughly 90 per cent of India’s population is non-vegetarian, Bengal’s famous machh-bhaat remains central to life. The worker indicated that the Chief Minister’s claims possess a basis in reality given reports of violence and forceful behavior regarding food choices during festivals in other states. Similarly, Kolkata resident Shehnaz Begum expressed that while she rejected the idea of non-vegetarian food suddenly disappearing, she feared a change in government might complicate everyday life if communal tensions increase. She voiced support for Banerjee’s leadership, believing the current government attempts to take everyone along while hoping for continued development.
Offering a more measured assessment at Sankar Cabin, owner Ram Krishna Gharai predicted the TMC might return to power with a slightly reduced seat tally, stressing that any incoming government must prioritize people's needs over dramatic shifts. Conversely, a bike taxi rider dismissed the alarm, stating that locals are not particularly concerned because no party could successfully impose dietary restrictions in a state where non-vegetarian food is a staple. Sharadwat Mukherjee, the BJP candidate from Bidhannagar, explained that his viral campaign with a fish was a direct effort to counter the opposition's narrative that the BJP would convert West Bengal into a vegetarian state. Mukherjee, an eggetarian himself, asserted that fish is central to Bengali nutrition and identity, and while he did not expect the image to go viral, he lamented that Bengal’s elections now revolve around emotional diets rather than infrastructure, education, or industry.
Mukherjee criticized the Chief Minister as a "dole distributor" who has forgotten that taxpayer money should fund health and the economy, arguing that welfare politics has overshadowed long-term development. He characterized the narratives set by political parties as useless things that turn people into something they should not be, comparing the situation unfavorably to states like Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Tamil Nadu where debates focus on investment. As election rallies amplify these slogans, the corners of Kolkata tell a subtler story, with an electorate that remains attentive and measured, weighing narratives between mouthfuls of biryani as they contemplate the future of their state and their plates.
The convergence of dietary habits and political survival in West Bengal highlights a significant shift toward identity-based campaigning, where the preservation of cultural staples like fish becomes a battleground for communal harmony and governance. As voters navigate these emotional narratives against the backdrop of economic needs, the outcome of this election will likely reflect whether the populace prioritizes the protection of their culinary heritage or the promise of industrial development.
About The Author
.jpg)
.jpg)
Comment List